The Revenue Rises
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Economy
Trending Now
S&P 500 Earnings for 2025 Q1 — Still...
S&P 500 Earnings for 2025 Q1 — Still...
Money’s Not Leaving the Market — It’s Rotating!
From Oversold to Opportunity: Small Caps on the...
Tariffs and weaker beer demand are weighing on...
Essence Fest leads a summer of events for...
Pullbacks & Reversals: Stocks Setting Up for Big...
S&P 500 Earnings for 2025 Q1 — Still...
Market Signals Align – Is a Bigger Move...
MACD Crossovers: Why Most Traders Get It Wrong

The Revenue Rises

  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Economy
Politics

How Harris and Trump answered foreign policy questions during the debate

by admin September 11, 2024
September 11, 2024
How Harris and Trump answered foreign policy questions during the debate

Vice President Kamala Harris accused former president Donald Trump of taking a soft tack with Xi Jinping, the leader of China, and other strongmen during Tuesday’s presidential debate. Trump sought to paint those relationships as a strength, baselessly claiming that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the Gaza conflict would not have happened if he had won in 2020.

Focusing her foreign policy answers by promising to stand by allies, Harris said that, as president, she would ensure that the United States retain its role and responsibility in the world order.

Here is what the candidates said on foreign policy during their debate.

China

Trump began the debate by touting his proposed tariffs on foreign nations, and claiming that China and other trading partners have been “ripping us off for years.” Harris responded by pointing to the escalating trade deficit during his time in office, saying that Trump had “invited trade wars,” while “selling American chips to China to help them improve and modernize their military.”

Trump had previously called for sweeping new tariffs of at least 10 percent on imports if he is reelected, raising concerns of a trade war with China if he returns to the White House.

Harris attacked Trump for praising Xi’s response to the outbreak of the coronavirus, “When we know that Xi was responsible for … not giving us transparency about the origins of covid.” She was referring to a social media post by Trump in January 2020, in which he said: “China has been working very hard to contain the Coronavirus. The United States greatly appreciates their efforts and transparency. It will all work out well. In particular, on behalf of the American People, I want to thank President Xi!” The lack of clarity about how the pandemic began has long been a source of tensions between Washington and Beijing.

Harris also sought to turn Trump’s own remarks against him, particularly about his relationships with autocratic leaders, including Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. She suggested these world leaders want Trump back in office because they can manipulate him.

“These autocrats and dictators are itching for you to be president again, because they know you can be manipulated,” Harris said.

Ukraine

Trump sidestepped the question about whether he wants Ukraine to win the war and refused to say whether a victory for Kyiv is in America’s best interests. He said it’s in the best interest of the United States “to get this war finished and just get it done.”

“I will get it settled before I even become president,” Trump said, without providing details of how he might accomplish that.

The exchanges on the Ukraine war, which has now gone on for more than two years, quickly turned combative, with Harris challenging Trump on his embrace of authoritarian leaders like Putin. “If Donald Trump were president, Putin would be sitting in Kyiv right now,” she said, adding that Putin would be eyeing Europe next. She later charged that Trump would give up on U.S. allies “for the sake of favor” from a dictator “who would eat you for lunch.”

Trump’s earlier praise of Moscow and refusal to condemn many of Putin’s actions have underscored his persistent admiration of Russia.

“I believe the reason that Donald Trump says that this war would be over within 24 hours is because he would just give it up, and that’s not who we are as Americans,” Harris said, as she highlighted the Biden administration’s large military support for Ukraine.

Israel and Gaza

Harris did not stray far from the Biden administration’s current stance on the war in Gaza, stating that “Israel has a right to defend itself,” but that “how it does so matters because it is also true far too many innocent Palestinians have been killed.”

She reiterated her support for a two-state solution, a proposal that supports two territorially distinct states — one for Israelis and one for Palestinians. She also characterized Trump as a “weak and wrong” when it comes to foreign policy and national security. During a heated exchange, Trump claimed, without evidence, that Harris “hates Israel” and “hates the Arab population” and said that if he were president, the wars in Ukraine and in Gaza would not have started.

“What we know is that this war must end,” Harris said. “It must end immediately, and the way it will end is we need a cease-fire deal and we need the hostages out. And so we will continue to work around the clock on that.”

She added: “The one thing I will assure you always — I will always give Israel the ability to defend itself, in particular as it relates to Iran and any threat that Iran and its proxies pose to Israel.”

U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan

Harris addressed the current administration’s controversial withdrawal from Afghanistan in mid-2021 by saying that she ultimately agrees with Biden’s decision to pull out.

“Four presidents said they would, and Joe Biden did,” she said. “And as a result, America’s taxpayers are not paying the $300 million a day we were paying for that endless war.” The figure comes from an estimate by a team of Brown University researchers, which calculated that the total U.S. cost of fighting in Afghanistan reached $2.3 trillion from 2001-2022.

She attacked Trump’s self-styled reputation as a dealmaker, stating that he “negotiated directly with a terrorist organization called the Taliban” and agreed to release 5,000 of its members. Trump defended his negotiation efforts, stating that his opponents “deal with the wrong people.” He claimed that his administration, had it won in the 2020 election, would have withdrawn more quickly.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

previous post
The fight for the future of the Murdoch media empire is about to begin
next post
Apple Unveils the iPhone 16: A Game-Changer for 2024

Related Posts

Harris flubs manufacturing jobs claim in MSNBC interview

September 26, 2024

RFK Jr. and the third-party effect are now...

August 9, 2024

At convention, Democrats claim patriotism, American flag as...

August 21, 2024

White House officials signal delay in U.S. Steel...

September 14, 2024

As China’s power grows, candidates use it as...

September 1, 2024

Menendez drops independent reelection bid for Senate ahead...

August 17, 2024

Four people charged with murder after restraining man...

August 7, 2024

Trump’s fusillade of falsehoods on debt and taxes

August 6, 2024

Iran denies plot against Trump, after U.S. reports...

July 18, 2024

Blinken indicates he would decline any offer to...

September 6, 2024

    Become a VIP member by signing up for our newsletter. Enjoy exclusive content, early access to sales, and special offers just for you! As a VIP, you'll receive personalized updates, loyalty rewards, and invitations to private events. Elevate your experience and join our exclusive community today!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • S&P 500 Earnings for 2025 Q1 — Still Overvalued
    • S&P 500 Earnings for 2025 Q1 — Still Overvalued
    • Money’s Not Leaving the Market — It’s Rotating!
    • From Oversold to Opportunity: Small Caps on the Move
    • Tariffs and weaker beer demand are weighing on Modelo owner Constellation Brands

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Polls show some good early signs for Kamala Harris

      July 26, 2024
    • 2

      Solana and Cardano: Solana is waiting for a new impulse

      July 18, 2024
    • 3

      The presidential race shifts — modestly, so far — toward Harris

      August 6, 2024
    • 4

      Donald Trump’s imaginary and frightening world

      September 23, 2024
    • 5

      Bitcoin Rebounds to $83,404 Amid Renewed Investor Confidence

      June 4, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (729)
    • Economy (975)
    • Politics (873)
    • Stocks (868)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: therevenuerises.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 The Revenue Rises. All Rights Reserved.